User Ideas / Prospects

Dear Fellow Engineers,

We didn’t become engineers to dehumanize, degrade, or destroy.

But right now, we’re at a turning point. Technologies that were once created in the spirit of innovation and imagination are being twisted into tools of violation, exploitation, and abuse.

From DeepFaceLab to StyleGAN, from LoRA fine-tuned on stolen imagery to Stable Diffusion pipelines trained to strip people’s dignity—these tools are being weaponized for one of the darkest sides of the internet: the non-consensual generation of pornographic images and videos.

We Are the Builders. But What Are We Building?

As engineers, we know the power of what we create. Yet some of the most advanced generative tools of our time are being trained and shared publicly with zero accountability, sometimes even encouraged by developer communities in the name of “freedom” and “open-source ethics.”

Let’s be clear:

There is nothing ethical about releasing a nudification model trained on stolen images.
There is no freedom in enabling the violation of someone’s bodily autonomy through AI.

Disturbing Incidents That Demand Action

• In 2023, a viral case from South Korea revealed that high school students had used AI apps to generate nude images of classmates, causing national outrage and leading to emergency legislative reviews.
• In India, a 2024 incident involved AI-generated pornographic content falsely linked to a prominent woman journalist. Despite her public denial, the damage to her reputation was irreversible and the videos are still circulating.
• A 2022 report from The Washington Post detailed how GitHub repositories were hosting step-by-step guides and pre-trained models to create deepfake pornography, openly accessible for months before takedown.
• YouTube and Telegram have been complicit too: multiple channels and groups are actively promoting NSFW AI-generated content, some under the guise of “art” or “AI experiments.” Many remain online despite repeated reports.

• In 2023, a viral case involved AI-generated nude images of Indian schoolgirls circulated on messaging apps. Despite outrage, police action was limited and delayed.

• Bollywood actresses and news anchors have had their faces superimposed on explicit videos using open-source AI tools. These videos resurface across adult sites and are difficult to remove.

• A YouTube channel with hundreds of thousands of views was recently discovered publishing AI-generated pornographic avatars, many resembling real women without consent.

• Multiple GitHub repositories continue to host nudification models with pre-trained weights under misleading names, escaping moderation.

We Must Act—Not Later, But Now

Report:
If you come across GitHub repos, Hugging Face models, Civitai LoRAs, or other public datasets/tools created with the intent of nudification, deepfake porn, or targeting individuals, report them immediately to platform moderators.

Refuse to Contribute:
Do not support, fork, or star repositories that even subtly hint at NSFW exploitation. Your one star validates misuse.

Call Out:
Challenge colleagues or friends who engage in or support the development of such tools. Stay respectful, but firm. Your silence is permission.

Appeal to Hosting Platforms:
Email, tag, or write to GitHub, Hugging Face, and other hosts. Ask them to ban or restrict AI models trained for NSFW or exploitative purposes, unless under strict license and regulation.

We appeal to you—NVIDIA, Stability AI, Meta, OpenAI, and others:

You are shaping the future. Will it be humane, or horrific?

• Do not release foundation models without safeguards.

• Do not allow NSFW or "uncensored" forks without hard boundaries.

• Do not sit silent while your tech enables harassment, revenge porn, or worse.

You owe more than disclaimers. You owe the world accountability.

Being an engineer doesn't mean you "just build the thing."
It means you understand the impact of what you build—and you choose humanity first.

Let’s build with conscience. Let’s build with care.
Let’s draw the line now, not when it’s too late.

If you’re an engineer who believes in ethics, decency, and dignity—speak up.
Share this. Post your own version. Report unethical code. Educate others.
And help make engineering a force for humanity—not harm.

Because if we don’t act, who will?

Visit engineersheaven.org to join a growing community of engineers working for social good.

Share this article on social media using #EngineeringForHumanity #EthicalAI #StopDeepFake

IntroductionIn the age of AI, engineers are unlocking unprecedented possibilities to reshape human life. But a growing number are choosing to exploit those powers—not to heal, educate, or uplift—but to materialize and objectify human bodies, especially women, through unethical deep learning applications like DeepFake porn, DeepNude generators, and nudification software. These tools, powered by open-source frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch, are being weaponized against humanity.

This article is a call to conscience—for engineers, researchers, developers, and students. It's time we examine how our tools are being used, and whether we’re shaping a future worth living in.

The Problem

1. Open Source, Open Abuse: TensorFlow, PyTorch, and similar frameworks were never meant to dehumanize. Yet today, they’re the backbone of underground communities creating deepfake pornography, often without consent. Pre-trained models and guides for face-swapping or nudifying victims are now just a search away.

2. Engineering Without Ethics: Many young developers, excited by the thrill of "what's possible," overlook the question of "what's right." This ethical vacuum has resulted in software that degrades dignity while being paraded as innovation.

3. Victims in Silence: Women—especially public figures and students—are increasingly being targeted. Most of these tools are deployed anonymously, making the pursuit of justice incredibly difficult. In many parts of the world, especially in India, laws exist but enforcement is slow, tech literacy in law enforcement is weak, and cultural stigmas keep victims from speaking up.

4. Demand and Desensitization: A disturbing digital culture fuels this. Mass consumption of non-consensual adult content generates demand, while platforms delay action. This isn't a fringe issue—it's becoming mainstream.

Disturbing Incidents That Demand Action

• In 2023, a viral case from South Korea revealed that high school students had used AI apps to generate nude images of classmates, causing national outrage and leading to emergency legislative reviews.

• In India, a 2024 incident involved AI-generated pornographic content falsely linked to a prominent woman journalist. Despite her public denial, the damage to her reputation was irreversible and the videos are still circulating.

• A 2022 report from The Washington Post detailed how GitHub repositories were hosting step-by-step guides and pre-trained models to create deepfake pornography, openly accessible for months before takedown.

• YouTube and Telegram have been complicit too: multiple channels and groups are actively promoting NSFW AI-generated content, some under the guise of “art” or “AI experiments.” Many remain online despite repeated reports.

The Role of Engineers

Engineers are not passive toolmakers. We are active participants in building the moral architecture of the digital world. Every piece of code we write either builds or breaks society. If we ignore where our models end up, we are complicit.

• We must adopt ethical development standards.

• We must build and support AI for defense, not destruction—like deepfake detection tools, authenticity watermarking, and consent-based modeling.

• We must call out and boycott platforms or repositories promoting unethical tech.

The Need for a Cultural Shift

In countries like India, there is little emotional or cultural attachment to engineering. Society idolizes godmen and film stars—but engineers, who shape the nation’s infrastructure, remain invisible. Until we restore dignity and responsibility to the engineering profession, it will continue to be hijacked by bad actors.

We must:

• Promote engineering ethics in colleges.

• Raise awareness through storytelling—highlight victims, expose harm, educate users.

• Hold our own accountable—just as the medical field regulates malpractice, we need tech peer-review and censure.

ConclusionWe are at a tipping point. The same algorithms that can bring clean water, predict disease, or connect remote classrooms are being used to violate people’s privacy, identity, and dignity. But we—engineers, developers, thinkers—still hold the power to rewrite this script.

Let’s not become the generation that built AI to destroy the soul of humanity. Let us be the ones who stood up and coded for conscience.

Call to Action:

• Share this article with your peers.

• Join the movement at engineersheaven.orgto advocate for ethical engineering.

• Speak out, build responsibly, and mentor others to do the same.

• Mechanical Engineering Focus: The failure centered on the O-rings in the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs), a critical mechanical sealing component. Mechanical engineers were directly involved in their design, testing, and assessment of their performance under various conditions, particularly temperature.
• Ethical Compromise (ME Context):
  • Public Safety Paramountcy: Mechanical engineers explicitly warned that the O-rings would lose their sealing capability at cold temperatures (below 53°F / 12°C), putting the lives of the astronauts at unacceptable risk. This warning was based on test data and mechanical principles.
  • Objectivity & Integrity: Management pressured the engineers to change their professional judgment and sign off on a launch recommendation that went against their data and expertise. The engineers' integrity was compromised by the hierarchy.
• Consequences:
  • Catastrophic Loss of Life: All seven astronauts died.
  • Fundamental Design Flaw Exposure: The investigation revealed a critical mechanical design vulnerability that was known but not adequately addressed.
  • Erosion of Trust: Damaged public and scientific trust in NASA and the engineering rigor of the space program.
  • Impact on Engineering Culture: Sparked widespread discussions about ethical responsibilities of engineers, the importance of dissenting technical opinions, and the role of management in suppressing safety concerns.
• ME Learning Point: Highlights the paramount ethical duty of mechanical engineers to prioritize safety over schedule or political pressure, and the importance of clear, unambiguous communication of risk. The O-ring failure is a classic case study in material science and mechanical design under extreme conditions, intrinsically linked to ethical decision-making.

• Mechanical Engineering Focus: The entire design of the fuel tank's placement and structural integrity in rear-end collisions was a mechanical engineering responsibility. The knowledge of the flaw stemmed from mechanical crash testing.
• Ethical Compromise (ME Context):
  • Public Safety Paramountcy: Mechanical engineers identified a known, critical design flaw that directly endangered occupants.
  • Environmental Stewardship (Indirect): While not direct environmental pollution, the fiery crashes added to environmental contamination and the high energy release was part of the lifecycle impact.
  • Fairness & Equity: The deliberate decision to compromise on safety was a choice to expose consumers to undue risk for profit, demonstrating a lack of fairness.
• Consequences:
  • Deaths and Severe Injuries: Due to fiery crashes, directly resulting from the compromised mechanical design.
  • Reputational Ruin: Ford's image as a responsible automaker was severely damaged.
  • Legal Precedent: Set a significant legal precedent for corporate accountability in product liability cases.
• ME Learning Point: A stark example of where mechanical engineers, or the management influencing them, made a cold, calculated decision to compromise on a known safety flaw in a mechanical system for economic gain, with tragic human consequences. It emphasizes the direct link between mechanical design choices and human life.

• Mechanical Engineering Focus: The installation of larger, more forward-placed engines (a mechanical change) on an existing airframe necessitated a new flight control software system (MCAS) to prevent aerodynamic stalls. Mechanical engineers were involved in the engine integration, aerodynamic analysis, and understanding the resulting flight dynamics. The failure to adequately inform pilots about MCAS's mechanical impact (e.g., trimming the stabilizer) was critical.
• Ethical Compromise (ME Context):
  • Public Safety & Reliability: Compromising comprehensive mechanical design analysis and pilot training requirements to avoid costly simulator training, prioritizing speed to market.
  • Integrity & Transparency: Insufficient disclosure of the MCAS system's operational details, which fundamentally altered how pilots interacted with the aircraft's mechanical controls.
  • Competence: Over-reliance on software to fix a mechanical/aerodynamic problem, without fully understanding its failure modes or adequately training users.
• Consequences:
  • Catastrophic Loss of Life: 346 fatalities across two crashes.
  • Global Grounding: Unprecedented grounding of an entire aircraft fleet, leading to massive financial losses for Boeing and airlines.
  • Severe Reputational Damage: Boeing's standing as an engineering leader severely tarnished.
  • Scrutiny of Regulatory Oversight: Highlighted failures in the FAA's certification process and its relationship with manufacturers.
• ME Learning Point: Shows how mechanical design changes (engine placement) can have ripple effects requiring complex software solutions, and how compromising on thorough testing, pilot training, and transparency can lead to catastrophic failures of a highly integrated mechanical-software system. It underscores the ethical responsibility in system-level mechanical design and integration.

• Mechanical Engineering Focus: The core of the scandal involved the design of the diesel engine and its emissions control system. Mechanical engineers were responsible for designing these engines, the exhaust gas recirculation systems, catalytic converters, and the embedded software that controlled their operation. The "defeat device" was a mechanical/software control system designed to lie.
• Ethical Compromise (ME Context):
  • Environmental Stewardship: Deliberately designing an engine that vastly exceeded legal emissions limits during normal operation. This directly contributed to air pollution and health problems.
  • Honesty & Integrity: Intentional deception in the design of the engine's control software to fool emissions tests. This was a clear act of fraud.
  • Public Health: The excess emissions directly impacted air quality in cities, contributing to respiratory diseases and other health issues.
• Consequences:
  • Massive Fines & Penalties: Billions of dollars in fines, one of the largest corporate penalties in history.
  • Criminal Charges & Imprisonment: For several executives and engineers involved.
  • Severe Reputational Damage: Permanently damaged VW's brand image and trust.
  • Environmental Impact: Millions of tons of excess pollutants released.
• ME Learning Point: A glaring example of mechanical engineers (and their leadership) making a conscious, unethical decision to design a system to deceive regulators and the public, leading to massive environmental harm, legal repercussions, and reputational destruction. It highlights the ethical responsibilities in powertrain design and control systems.

• Mechanical Engineering Focus: While broader than just ME, mechanical engineers would have been involved in the design and operation of the chemical manufacturing processes, waste containment systems, and potentially the material handling and disposal infrastructure at the site. The failure of the containment and the subsequent environmental migration of chemicals are directly related to mechanical and civil engineering principles of sealing, flow, and material properties.
• Ethical Compromise (ME Context):
  • Environmental Stewardship: The decision to dump hazardous waste directly into an unlined canal, and later to sell the land knowing the risks, was a profound failure of environmental responsibility.
  • Public Health & Safety: Direct disregard for the long-term health and safety of the community that would eventually live near the site.
  • Accountability: The attempt to absolve responsibility through a deed disclaimer underscores an ethical failure in accountability.
• Consequences:
  • Severe Health Crisis: High rates of illness and birth defects among residents.
  • Mass Evacuation: Entire community displaced.
  • Long-Term Environmental Catastrophe: Designated a Superfund site requiring decades of cleanup.
  • Legal Precedent: Helped establish stricter environmental laws and corporate liability for pollution.
• ME Learning Point: Illustrates how improper waste management and disposal, stemming from a lack of foresight and ethical disregard for environmental and public health in industrial processes, can lead to devastating long-term consequences. Mechanical engineers have a role in designing sustainable and safe industrial systems, including waste handling.

These examples provide concrete, real-world illustrations of how compromising core ethical principles in mechanical engineering can lead to catastrophic, and often preventable, outcomes. They serve as powerful warnings and essential case studies for teaching responsible engineering.

Before diving into specifics, let's reiterate the core principles that form the foundation:

1. Public Health, Safety, and Welfare Paramountcy: The primary duty of an engineer is to protect the public. This means ensuring designs are safe, reliable, and do not pose undue risks to users or the environment.
2. Honesty and Integrity: Be truthful in all professional dealings, avoid deceptive acts, credit others' work, and don't misrepresent data or capabilities.
3. Competence: Practice only in areas of your expertise, and continuously update your knowledge and skills.
4. Objectivity and Impartiality: Base decisions on facts, data, and sound engineering judgment, not personal gain, bias, or external pressure.
5. Confidentiality and Intellectual Property: Protect proprietary information and respect intellectual property rights.
6. Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability: Consider the environmental impact of designs throughout their lifecycle and strive for sustainable solutions.
7. Professional Development and Lifelong Learning: Continuously enhance knowledge and skills, and contribute to the advancement of the profession.
8. Fairness and Equity: Design for broad accessibility and avoid discrimination or exacerbating societal inequalities.
9. Accountability and Transparency: Take responsibility for your work and be open about processes and potential risks.

Now, let's see how these general principles get specialized:

• Core Focus: Safety (crashworthiness, reliability), environmental impact (emissions, fuel efficiency), and user experience.
• Specific Ethical Principles/Considerations:
  • Safety Beyond Compliance: Not just meeting minimum regulatory standards, but striving for the highest possible safety features (e.g., advanced driver-assistance systems, robust crumple zones).
  • Autonomous Vehicle Ethics:
    • "Trolley Problem" scenarios: How should AI-driven cars make split-second decisions in unavoidable accident situations (e.g., protect occupants vs. minimize external harm)?
    • Responsibility & Liability: Who is accountable when an autonomous vehicle causes an accident (manufacturer, software developer, owner, user)?
    • Transparency of Algorithms: Should the decision-making logic of AVs be fully transparent?
  • Environmental Responsibility:
    • Emissions Cheating: The VW "Dieselgate" scandal is a prime example of a gross ethical breach.
    • Lifecycle Emissions: Accounting for emissions from manufacturing, use, and disposal (e.g., battery production for EVs).
    • Planned Obsolescence: Designing components to fail after a certain period to drive new sales vs. designing for durability and repairability.
  • Consumer Privacy: Data collected by connected cars (driving habits, location) and how it's used and protected.
  • Repairability and Right to Repair: Designing vehicles that can be repaired by independent mechanics, not just dealership networks, affecting consumer choice and cost.

• Core Focus: Safety in human-robot interaction, job displacement, autonomy, and accountability.
• Specific Ethical Principles/Considerations:
  • Human Safety & Control: Ensuring robots operate safely around humans, with clear stop mechanisms and predictable behavior. Prioritizing human life over robot function (akin to Asimov's Laws, but in a practical engineering context).
  • Accountability for Autonomous Actions: As robots become more autonomous, determining who is responsible for their actions and failures.
  • Job Displacement: Ethical obligation to consider the societal impact of automation on the workforce and contribute to solutions (e.g., reskilling, UBI discussions).
  • Bias in Robotic Perception/Action: If robots use AI, ensuring their decision-making isn't biased against certain demographics.
  • Exploitation/Manipulation: Designing robots (especially companion or care robots) not to exploit vulnerable users' emotions or create unhealthy dependencies. Transparency about a robot's non-human nature.
  • Privacy & Surveillance: Robots with sensors (cameras, microphones) collecting data in homes or public spaces.

• Core Focus: Worker safety, environmental impact of production, resource efficiency, and supply chain ethics.
• Specific Ethical Principles/Considerations:
  • Worker Safety & Well-being: Designing safe factory environments, ergonomic workstations, and proper safeguards for machinery. Avoiding dangerous practices or cutting corners on safety training.
  • Environmental Pollution: Minimizing waste, air and water pollution from manufacturing processes. Responsible disposal of hazardous materials.
  • Resource Depletion: Optimizing material usage, energy efficiency in production, and exploring sustainable manufacturing methods (e.g., additive manufacturing to reduce waste).
  • Supply Chain Ethics: Ensuring ethical labor practices (no child labor, fair wages, safe conditions) and sustainable sourcing of raw materials across global supply chains.
  • Quality Control & Reliability: Ensuring products are manufactured to specified quality standards to prevent defects that could cause harm.
  • Automation & Human Dignity: While automation can reduce dangerous tasks, ensuring it doesn't dehumanize labor or create excessively monitored environments.

• Core Focus: Extreme safety and reliability, national security implications, environmental impact of flight.
• Specific Ethical Principles/Considerations:
  • Absolute Reliability: Given the catastrophic consequences of failure, an exceptionally high ethical bar for reliability, redundancy, and testing.
  • Public Trust: Maintaining public trust in air travel and space exploration.
  • National Security vs. Civilian Harm: The ethical implications of designing military aircraft or weapons systems, particularly regarding minimizing civilian casualties and adhering to international law.
  • Environmental Impact of Aviation: Reducing carbon emissions, noise pollution, and other environmental impacts of air travel. Designing more efficient engines and alternative fuels.
  • Space Debris: Ethical responsibility for contributing to and mitigating orbital debris, which poses a long-term threat to future space activities.

• Core Focus: Energy efficiency, environmental impact, public health (indoor air quality), and equitable access to energy.
• Specific Ethical Principles/Considerations:
  • Energy Efficiency & Conservation: Designing systems that minimize energy consumption to reduce environmental footprint and operational costs for users.
  • Indoor Air Quality & Health: Ensuring HVAC systems provide healthy indoor environments, preventing mold, pathogens, and poor ventilation.
  • Sustainable Material Sourcing: Ethical considerations in mining and processing rare earth minerals for renewable energy components (e.g., wind turbines, solar panels, batteries).
  • Land Use & Ecosystem Impact: Ethical management of land footprint for large-scale solar farms or wind turbine installations, considering impact on local ecosystems and communities.
  • Equity and Access: Ensuring that sustainable energy solutions are accessible and affordable to all segments of society, not just the privileged. Avoiding "green gentrification."
  • Long-Term Decommissioning: Planning for the responsible disposal and recycling of renewable energy infrastructure at the end of its lifespan.

Common Thread: In every subfield, the engineer's ethical challenge lies in balancing technical requirements, economic pressures, regulatory compliance, and market demands with the paramount duty to uphold public health, safety, welfare, environmental stewardship, and human dignity. Your personal strategy of documenting concerns and asking for explicit directives is a powerful practical application of these principles in a high-pressure, "money-hungry" environment. This type of proactive ethical engineering is precisely what your course should aim to teach.

From smart homes and cashless cafes to AI tutors for the rich — engineering is thriving. Yet, thousands of government schools still don’t have basic science labs. Rural hospitals run without refrigeration while startups build robots to fold laundry.

Something’s off.

Engineering talent is being directed toward solving premium problems:

• Drone delivery for groceries, but no last-mile cold chains for vaccines.

• Data centers for digital ads, but no solar grids for tribal schools.

• Algorithms for luxury shopping, but no systems for farmer market pricing transparency.

It’s not that these innovations are bad — they’re just disproportionately prioritized.

We are witnessing a split:

• Urban elites get AI-generated legal assistance. Villagers still wait for a basic court date.

• Smart irrigation for export farms. Manual water carry for subsistence farmers.

• EdTech for private coaching. Chalkboards for public education.

This isn’t innovation for humanity. It’s innovation for profitability.

We don’t reject advancement. We demand balance.

Imagine:

• Engineers focusing on public sanitation sensors, not just smart kitchen gadgets.

• College incubators supporting rural transport solutions, not just crypto wallets.

• National hackathons targeting public health tools, not dating apps.

That’s the shift — from indulgence to inclusion.

Engineers must:

• Redefine success as impact for many, not luxury for a few.

• Choose career paths that address societal needs, not just salaries.

• Build with empathy, test with diversity, deploy with equity.

Let us remember: the best engineering is not what dazzles — it’s what dignifies.

Subfield: Aerospace Propulsion & Mechanical Systems
Born: 1931, Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu
Education: B.Sc. Physics; Aeronautical Engineering (MIT, Chennai)
Key Contributions:

• Integral to India’s missile development programs (Agni, Prithvi).

• Worked on India's first satellite launch vehicle (SLV-III).

• Served as the Scientific Advisor to the Defense Minister.
  Legacy:

• A visionary engineer with a deep understanding of aerodynamics, propulsion systems, and composite materials.

• Advocated for youth involvement in science and ethical responsibility in engineering.
   

• Notable Quotes:

“Dream, dream, dream. Dreams transform into thoughts and thoughts result in action.”
— Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
(Economic Times)

“If you're a mechanical engineer, don't feel so proud, because you can repair everything except your own heart.”
— Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
(Goodreads)

Subfield: Materials Science & Engineering Policy
Born: 1935, Tamil Nadu
Education: Mechanical Engineering; specialized in materials
Key Contributions:

• Pioneered India’s research in defense materials.

• Served as Scientific Advisor to the Defence Minister (1982–1992).

• Headed DRDO and contributed to key indigenous technology missions.
  Legacy:

• Bridged R&D and industrial production of materials like composites, alloys, and ceramics for defense applications.

• Notable Quote:

“I always say, 'Be near science and technology, and you will never fail.”
— Dr. V.S. Arunachalam

Subfield: Aerospace Structures & Mechanical Systems Design
Born: 1943, Brahmapur, Odisha
Education: B.E. Mechanical Engineering (IIT BHU), M.E. Aerospace Engineering (IISc), Ph.D. (IIT Bombay)
Key Contributions:

• Chief architect of India’s Light Combat Aircraft (Tejas).

• Integrated mechanical design with avionics, aerodynamics, and manufacturing.

• Promoted indigenous aerospace ecosystem in India.
  Legacy:

• A pioneer in applying mechanical engineering to high-tech aviation systems and project leadership.
  Notable Quote:

“The Tejas project was not just about building a fighter aircraft; it was about building confidence in India's engineering capabilities.”
— Dr. Kota Harinarayana
(Economic Times)

Subfield: Missile Structures, Thermal Systems, Project Management
Born: 1947, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu
Education: B.E. Mechanical Engineering; Ph.D. in Technology Management
Key Contributions:

• CEO & MD of BrahMos Aerospace.

• Worked closely with Dr. Kalam in missile development.

• Specialist in integrating propulsion systems, thermal management, and structural dynamics.
  Legacy:

• Known as the “Father of BrahMos,” blending advanced mechanical engineering with strategic technology.
  Notable Quote:

“We can work on hypersonics and can definitely prove (to the world) that we are capable here too.”
— Dr. A. Sivathanu Pillai
(Economic Times)

Subfield: Fluid Mechanics, Polymer Science, and Innovation Policy
Born: 1943, Mashel, Goa (raised in a Mumbai slum)
Education: B.E. Mechanical Engineering (ICT Mumbai), Ph.D.
Key Contributions:

• Revolutionized polymer processing and rheology.

• Former Director-General of CSIR.

• Promoted intellectual property rights and grassroots innovation.
  Legacy:

• Globally respected for his work in thermofluids and polymer mechanics.

• Pioneered the idea of “inclusive innovation” for affordable technology development.
  Notable Quotes:

“An innovator is one who does not know it cannot be done.”
— Dr. R.A. Mashelkar
(AZ Quotes)

“Innovation is the key for the production as well as processing of knowledge. Indeed a nation’s ability to convert knowledge into wealth and social good through the process of innovation determines its future.”
— Dr. R.A. Mashelkar
(Mashelkar.com)

Subfield: Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, Energy Systems
Born: 1945, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Education: B.E. Mechanical Engineering (Madras), Ph.D. (Princeton University) In Chemical Engineering
Key Contributions:

• Former Director of IIT Madras.

• He also got Herdillia award for excellence in basic research in chemical engineering. though he is well known chemical engineer as well. 

• Known for contributions to phase equilibrium thermodynamics and energy systems modeling.
  Legacy:

• Combined research excellence with academic leadership to shape engineering education in India.
  Notable Quote:

“Education is not just about imparting knowledge; it's about inspiring innovation and critical thinking.”
— Prof. M.S. Ananth
(IIT Bombay Chemical Engineering Department)

Subfield: Heat Transfer, Renewable Energy, Engineering Education
Born: Maharashtra
Education: Mechanical Engineering (IIT Bombay), Ph.D. (MIT)
Key Contributions:

• Former Director, IIT Bombay.

• Author of India’s most-used heat transfer textbook.

• Played a key role in developing India's solar energy research.
  Legacy:

• Mentor to generations of engineers, promoter of solar energy technologies in India.
  Notable Quote:

“Understanding heat transfer is fundamental to solving many of the world's energy problems.”
— Dr. S.P. Sukhatme
(Scribd)

Subfield: Aerospace Mechanical Systems, Launch Dynamics
Born: 1943, Karnataka
Education: B.E. Mechanical Engineering, M.E. (IIT Madras), Ph.D. (Salford University)
Key Contributions:

• Key contributor to ISRO’s launch vehicle and recovery systems.

• Served as Director of Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC).
  Legacy:

• Bridged mechanical engineering principles with space technology design, guidance systems, and recovery mechanisms.
  Notable Quote:

“When we come across challenges, we can treat them either from a perspective of helplessness or from a standpoint of one’s own belief. Choosing the latter opens up a vista of opportunities.”
— Dr. B.N. Suresh
(INAE)

• Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam: Wings of Fire, Ignited Minds, India 2020
  Message: Emphasized the importance of dreaming big and working hard to achieve those dreams.

• Dr. V.S. Arunachalam: From Temples to Turbines: An Adventure in Two Worlds
  Message: Advocated for self-reliance in technology and innovation.

• Dr. A. Sivathanu Pillai: The Path Unexplored, Thoughts for Change
  Message: Encouraged engineers to embrace innovation and leadership.

• Dr. R.A. Mashelkar: Reinventing India, Gandhian Engineering
  Message: Promoted inclusive innovation and the importance of intellectual property rights.

Civil engineering is the invisible framework upon which society stands — roads, bridges, buildings, and water systems all begin with the calculations, designs, and integrity of civil engineers. But while concrete, steel, and stone can be measured, the ethical strength of the professionals behind the project is often less visible — and far more critical.

In recent years, India has seen several public infrastructure failures, cost overruns, and delays. Dig deeper, and a disturbing pattern emerges: compromised engineering ethics. This article explores how civil engineering ethics are not merely academic ideals, but the very foundation upon which public trust, safety, and progress depend.

Professional ethics in civil engineering are grounded in three pillars:

1. Public Safety Above All

2. Integrity in Design, Materials, and Execution

3. Responsibility Toward Environment and Future Generations

These aren’t just principles—they are legal, social, and professional obligations that every engineer assumes once they step into the field.

Case: In 2022, a bridge in Gujarat collapsed just days after being renovated. Investigations revealed that the renovation firm lacked structural engineering expertise, and the safety inspections were signed off without proper checks.

Ethical Breach: Certification without due diligence, failure to warn stakeholders, disregard for safety norms.

Civil engineers involved in procurement sometimes approve low-quality cement, steel, or aggregates in exchange for bribes or under pressure from contractors.

Example: A mid-size dam project in Maharashtra was found leaking within a year of commissioning — core samples revealed poor-grade concrete used to cut costs.

Ethical Breach: Misrepresentation, negligence, endangerment of public resources.

It is increasingly common for tender specifications to be drafted in a way that favors a specific contractor or vendor — often due to internal collusion.

Example: An urban flyover project was delayed by 3 years due to legal disputes over irregularities in awarding tenders.

Ethical Breach: Conflict of interest, corruption, anti-competitive practices.

Project status reports are sometimes forged to claim stage payments without real progress on the ground, especially in government-funded rural projects.

Impact: Delayed roads, drainage systems, or schools in underserved areas — which exist only on paper.

Ethical Breach: Fraud, dereliction of duty, systemic dishonesty.

• Human Tragedies: Infrastructure collapse can directly cause injuries or fatalities.

• Economic Drain: Rework, litigation, and emergency mitigation inflate costs and delay development.

• Environmental Damage: Illegal dumping, deforestation, or over-extraction of materials often stems from unethical decision-making.

• Public Distrust: Citizens lose faith in engineering institutions, contractors, and government schemes.

• Global Reputation Hit: International investors hesitate to fund projects plagued with poor ethical records.

• Increased Project Complexity: Smart cities, metros, high-speed rail — all require ethical engineers who can balance technology, safety, and public welfare.

• PPP Model Expansion: With private players entering public infrastructure, transparency and ethical checks are essential to avoid profit-driven shortcuts.

• Climate Crisis: Ethical decisions are now environmental decisions — engineers play a major role in ensuring sustainability.

• Digital Oversight: With drone audits, satellite imagery, and real-time reporting, unethical practices are more likely to be exposed.

• Ethics should be taught as core engineering coursework, with case studies of past failures and disasters.

• Third-party audits should be mandatory at key project stages — not just at completion.

• Engineers should be required to renew their license with mandatory ethics training every 3–5 years.

• Civil engineers who report corruption must be given legal protection and anonymity.

• E-tendering platforms with algorithmic review and open public access can reduce scope for manipulation.

Your role is more than just to design and construct — it is to serve society with honesty and foresight. The bridge you draw on CAD is not just a structure — it will carry mothers, workers, and schoolchildren. The foundation you calculate could hold a hospital or a school. You are not just shaping concrete — you are shaping lives.

Civil engineering is one of the oldest and most noble professions — but only when its ethics are as strong as the structures it builds. As India scales up infrastructure, it must also scale up its ethical vigilance. Because without integrity, even the grandest projects are doomed to fall — in spirit, if not in structure.

Introduction: When Machines Fail Because Morals Do

In mechanical engineering, failure is not just a technical anomaly — it is often an ethical one. While bolts and bearings hold systems together, it is ethics that holds the profession itself intact. Yet, increasingly across India, we’re witnessing a systemic erosion of engineering morality in real-world projects. From inflated procurement to compromised safety checks, the absence of ethics has begun to corrode more than just machinery — it threatens lives, economies, and the profession’s future.

This article delves into why fundamental ethics in mechanical engineering are not optional but essential — and how the cost of ignoring them is dangerously high.

The Ethical Foundation of Mechanical Engineering

Mechanical engineering is governed by a simple but powerful principle: design and deliver systems that are safe, efficient, and in service of humanity. The ethical codes embedded in institutions like the Indian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME) and ASME aren’t ceremonial guidelines. They are safeguards against misuse, malpractice, and mechanical disasters.

Core Ethical Tenets Include:

• Prioritizing public safety and welfare

• Honesty in design and reporting

• Avoiding conflicts of interest

• Fairness in procurement and project execution

• Lifelong commitment to competence and responsibility

But what happens when these values are bent — or worse, ignored?

When Ethics Collapse, So Do Projects — And People 1. Safety Breaches: Cutting Costs, Costing Lives

When mechanical engineers skip safety tests or use substandard materials, the results can be catastrophic.

Example: In a factory boiler explosion in Uttar Pradesh (2023), it was revealed that the pressure relief valve was never tested during installation — a direct violation of engineering protocol. Seven workers lost their lives.

Ethical Violation: Neglecting safety in favor of project deadlines or cost savings.

2. Fake Maintenance: A Paper Trail of Corruption

Engineers overseeing machinery maintenance sometimes forge service reports to pocket funds or avoid effort.

Case: A failed pump system in an irrigation scheme in Karnataka led to crop failures across 20 villages — maintenance logs were fabricated, and no real servicing had taken place in over 18 months.

Ethical Violation: Dishonesty, failure to uphold duty of care.

3. Collusive Procurement: Engineering for Greed

When engineers draft tenders that are biased or technically manipulated to favor one vendor, it warps market fairness and inflates project costs.

Evidence: A material handling system in a public steel plant saw inflated prices because the specification was tailored to a single vendor, excluding more affordable, competitive suppliers.

Ethical Violation: Conflict of interest, undermining public trust.

The Larger Cost of Ethical Decay

•  Infrastructure Integrity Loss
  • Structures built on unethical decisions may not last — leading to more public funding on repairs, rebuilds, and emergency responses.
•  Industrial Accidents Rise
  • ​From oil refineries to textile mills, cutting ethical corners in design and maintenance often leads to fire hazards, mechanical failures, and fatalities.
• Devaluation of the Profession
  • ​When ethical lapses become routine, they stain the reputation of all mechanical engineers, including those who are honest. It discourages talent and erodes public trust.
• Economic Drain
  • ​Inflated contracts, failed systems, and lawsuits due to technical fraud drain taxpayer money and slow national industrial progress.

Ethics Are Not Impractical — They're Structural

Some argue that ethical standards are idealistic in today’s competitive, client-driven environment. But in truth, ethics are as practical and structural as any physical component.

“An engineer without ethics is like a bridge without a foundation — it may look fine for a while, but it will collapse under real pressure.”
— A retired PSU Mechanical Project Head, quoted anonymously

How to Reinforce Ethics in Mechanical Engineering ? Curriculum Overhaul

• Engineering ethics should not be a side-topic but a mandatory, graded subject in all mechanical engineering programs.

• Case studies of ethical failures should be taught to highlight real-world consequences.

Institutional Accountability

• Public projects must involve third-party audits.

• Engineers must be held personally accountable for certification reports and safety clearances.

Cultural Change Within Firms

• Whistleblower protections and anonymous reporting mechanisms should be in place.

• Ethical performance should be part of annual appraisals, not just delivery metrics.

Industry Oversight & Media

• Transparency portals for mechanical tenders and certifications

• Investigative journalism in engineering and infrastructure sectors should be encouraged and protected.

Conclusion: Build with Integrity, or Prepare to Rebuild with Regret

The wrench in an engineer's hand can either tighten a system to perfection or loosen it toward disaster — depending on whether ethics is guiding the hand. Mechanical engineers play a foundational role in shaping India's infrastructure and industry. Upholding ethical standards isn’t just a moral duty — it’s a professional necessity.

If we want our systems to work without failure, we must first ensure that our engineers do not.

1. Structural Design Consultancy

• What It Is: Offering structural analysis and design services for residential and small commercial buildings.

• Skills Needed: STAAD Pro, AutoCAD/Revit, knowledge of IS Codes, soil mechanics

• Resources Required: A computer with licensed software, basic printer/scanner, professional license (if required)

• Initial Budget: ₹1.5 – ₹2.5 Lakhs

• Market Demand: Growing in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns due to private home construction and local real estate.

• Feasibility: High—can be started from home; no large team needed initially

• Use Cases: Independent houses, small apartments, shops, town planning projects

• Business Tips: Network with local contractors, panchayats, and architects

2. Land Surveying with Drones and GIS

• What It Is: Providing topographic and layout surveys using drone technology and GIS mapping

• Skills Needed: Drone piloting certification, GIS software (QGIS/ArcGIS), basic mapping knowledge

• Resources Required: Survey-grade drone (DJI Phantom/RTK), GIS software, laptop

• Initial Budget: ₹3 – ₹5 Lakhs (includes drone, licensing, training)

• Market Demand: Landowners, real estate developers, municipal mapping projects

• Feasibility: Moderate—requires some initial training and permissions

• Use Cases: Land division, layout approvals, real estate plotting, road development

• Business Tips: Get DGCA drone certification and work under an experienced mapper initially

3. Rainwater Harvesting and Groundwater Recharge Solutions

• What It Is: Designing and installing rainwater harvesting systems for homes, schools, and colonies

• Skills Needed: Plumbing design, basic hydrology, knowledge of water act and bylaws

• Resources Required: Simple plumbing tools, rainwater filters, piping systems

• Initial Budget: ₹50,000 – ₹1.5 Lakhs

• Market Demand: High in water-scarce regions, government building mandates, NGOs

• Feasibility: High—low investment and awareness-driven demand

• Use Cases: Schools, residential complexes, panchayat buildings

• Business Tips: Get IGBC/green certification and partner with local plumbers

4. Precast Concrete Elements Manufacturing

• What It Is: Manufacturing pre-made concrete items like fencing poles, septic tanks, rings, pavers

• Skills Needed: Knowledge of concrete mix design, casting, curing, and safety

• Resources Required: Molds, small mixing unit, water tank, open space (1000+ sqft)

• Initial Budget: ₹5 – ₹8 Lakhs

• Market Demand: Steady in growing towns, especially for local construction

• Feasibility: High—suitable for small-town demand; labor-intensive but profitable

• Use Cases: Roads, housing, landscaping, public works

• Business Tips: Supply to local contractors, municipal offices, and farms

5. Construction Material Testing Laboratory

• What It Is: Providing testing for soil, concrete, bricks, and steel as per IS codes

• Skills Needed: IS code compliance, material properties, lab equipment handling

• Resources Required: Compression machine, sieves, slump cones, cube molds, space (250–500 sqft)

• Initial Budget: ₹5 – ₹10 Lakhs (could start basic under ₹5 Lakhs)

• Market Demand: Builders, government projects, NGOs, quality auditing firms

• Feasibility: Medium—regulatory approval needed but offers consistent income

• Use Cases: Real estate quality control, road projects, school buildings

• Business Tips: Approach local PWD, contractors, and developers for tie-ups

6. Waterproofing and Soil Stabilization Contractor

• What It Is: Offering services like chemical waterproofing, soil hardening, anti-termite treatment

• Skills Needed: On-site application, chemistry of materials, vendor networking

• Resources Required: Spray tools, safety gear, chemicals

• Initial Budget: ₹1 – ₹3 Lakhs

• Market Demand: New and old constructions, especially in monsoon-prone areas

• Feasibility: Very high—skills are niche, margins are strong

• Use Cases: Basement buildings, tanking structures, wet areas of homes

• Business Tips: Learn from a senior contractor first, then scale independently

7. Road Repair and Maintenance Micro-Contractor

• What It Is: Taking up small-scale road patchwork, paver-block laying, or footpath repair

• Skills Needed: Road construction techniques, estimation, contractor licensing

• Resources Required: Roller/rammers (rentable), tools, labor team

• Initial Budget: ₹2 – ₹4 Lakhs

• Market Demand: Panchayats, municipal bodies, private gated communities

• Feasibility: Moderate—requires relationship building with civic authorities

• Use Cases: Rural PMGSY roads, school compounds, approach roads

• Business Tips: Bid on e-tenders; start as a subcontractor

8. Freelance Quantity Surveying and Estimation Services

• What It Is: Preparing BOQs, costing, budgeting for small projects

• Skills Needed: Costing software (CANDY, Excel, Buildsoft), IS codes

• Resources Required: Laptop, software licenses, printer

• Initial Budget: ₹50,000 – ₹1 Lakh

• Market Demand: Architects, builders, small contractors

• Feasibility: High—minimal capital and remote work friendly

• Use Cases: Villas, low-rise apartments, interior renovations

• Business Tips: Market on LinkedIn, Justdial, UrbanClap (now Urban Company)

Summary Table

In a country where infrastructure and industrial development remain central to progress, the role of mechanical engineers in public and private sector projects is crucial. However, beneath the surface of innovation and execution lies a web of vulnerabilities. Mechanical engineering projects — from factory setups to large-scale government tenders — are increasingly at risk of corruption.

This article explores how these technical projects become gateways for unethical practices and highlights specific stages where mechanical engineers, if not monitored, may manipulate processes for personal or institutional gain.

Procurement — the heart of every mechanical project — often becomes a tool for corruption. Engineers responsible for defining technical specifications may deliberately list oversized, overpriced, or unnecessary equipment.

Case Insight: A municipal water treatment project in Madhya Pradesh reportedly included motors 25% higher in capacity than required, allegedly to inflate procurement costs and secure vendor kickbacks.

Common Tactics:

• Specifying only one brand/model in tenders

• Falsifying technical justifications

• Receiving bribes or “commissions” from vendors

Fabrication contracts involve high-value metalwork, piping, and structural manufacturing — areas ripe for malpractice. Welders, contractors, and site engineers may collude to skip steps or use lower-grade materials while billing for full specs.

Example: In an industrial estate project in Gujarat, several load-bearing frames collapsed due to substandard welding, later found to have bypassed non-destructive testing (NDT) stages entirely.

Red Flags:

• Unrecorded or forged test reports

• Reduced metal thickness

• Fake or unchecked inspection tags

Mechanical systems like HVAC, boilers, and conveyor systems require routine maintenance. This ongoing service often becomes a grey area of exploitation.

Observation: An audit of a public sector manufacturing unit revealed payments made for routine bearing replacements — with the same bearings still intact.

Corruption Modes:

• False maintenance logs

• Inflated spares billing

• Recycling old parts as new

With rising energy costs and green mandates, mechanical engineers lead many retrofitting and energy audit projects. But these too can be gamed.

Example: In Maharashtra, a factory claimed a 30% reduction in energy consumption via motor replacements. An RTI probe revealed no such replacements had occurred — only old labels were replaced.

Corrupt Practices:

• Falsified energy reports

• Misleading ROI calculations

• Claiming subsidies without actual work

Testing and quality assurance (QA/QC) phases offer engineers authority to approve or reject components. This gatekeeping role is vulnerable to misuse.

Incident: A pressure vessel in an Odisha plant was certified fit without a hydro test — later bursting during trial, injuring workers.

Typical Malpractices:

• Accepting bribes to overlook defects

• Faking calibration or stress test reports

• Accepting expired or reused parts

Public tenders and contract bids are increasingly digitized, yet many engineers still influence the process by setting biased eligibility criteria.

Real-world Note: A PSU tender required an obscure ISO certification only one vendor possessed — a classic move to eliminate competition.

Mechanisms of Corruption:

• Pre-qualifying specific vendors

• Leaking technical bid details

• Colluding with procurement officials

Engineers managing warehouses or project inventories sometimes misuse their control for personal profit.

Risks Include:

• Procuring unused spares to resell outside

• Billing for items never installed

• Creating false shortage to justify reorders

Ensuring safety and regulatory compliance is often the last step — and often compromised. Engineers signing off on faulty systems or misreporting safety metrics can put entire plants and workers at risk.

Alarming Cases:

• Ventilation issues in textile mills being passed despite high CO2 levels

• Safety audit reports reused from previous years

Corruption in mechanical engineering is not just about embezzlement. It directly affects:

• Public safety

• System efficiency

• National economic loss

• Reputation of the profession

A 2022 report by Transparency International India found that infrastructure-related corruption accounted for 32% of public complaints across technical domains, with mechanical project mismanagement topping the list after civil engineering.

• Institutional Checks

  • Mandate third-party validation for all testing

  • Public digital procurement platforms with transparent evaluation

• Engineering Ethics Reform

  • Stronger incorporation of ethics in mechanical engineering curricula

  • Licensing penalties for proven malpractice

• Media and Public Oversight

  • Investigative journalism in infrastructure sectors

  • Use of RTI to access procurement and safety data

Mechanical engineering has been the silent backbone of India’s industrial journey. But silence should not mean invisibility. To ensure accountability and safety, stakeholders — from policy makers to educators and engineers themselves — must recognize and plug these corruption leaks.

Exposing and understanding these vulnerabilities is not a witch-hunt — it's an essential step toward restoring integrity in the sector.